[WF-Protocols] Prototype implementation from proposal

[Miguel Guzman Miranda]

Hi all,

	Sorry for not being around, spent half the week at the LinuxTag giving
around Worldforge flyers and showing some cool stuff :)

	Matze: I don't know if the current proposal is deemed acceptable by the
people around or is it simply that the traffic on the list has stalled.
In any case I think it's a good starting point so, what do you think
about starting the implementation? 

	We could make a loader and a writer for the omf.xml file (and define a
memory data model for it), and perhaps we both could do some converters,
like for instance for Ogre, Cal3D and Crystalspace. Interested? 

	Regards,

	Aglanor

	P.S.: this could be a good time to have a look at the new proposal
(http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uxsm/omf/test.xml) so you could yell
to us if you see something blatantly wrong with it, just before starting
coding a prototype. 

On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 11:09, Matze Braun wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Desmecht Laurent wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have read your proposition for skeletons, you put bones influences on
> > vertex in the skeleton object (as the .X format do, I think).
> > But isn't more interesant to put this in the mesh as the Cal3D format do ?
> > So we can share skeleton (and animation) between different meshs.
> Sharing Skeletons and animations is possible. The vertices and faces are 
> defined in the submesh sections. While the influences are defined 
> separately in the skeletalmap section. You can just create multiple 
> skeletalmap sections for different meshes or even different skeletons.
> 
> Greetings,
> 	Matze
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Protocols mailing list
> Protocols at mail.worldforge.org
> http://mail.worldforge.org/lists/listinfo/protocols