[WF-Protocols] Exchange/Native format
Matze Braun
matze at braunis.de
Tue Jul 1 16:06:04 PDT 2003
I think one of the first things we should discuss is wether we
should focus on a model exchange format or something which can be used by
engines. IMO we should focus on an exchange format. I think having a very
customisable and extensible format as main model format will result in
performance problems:
-The data is probably not in the order that the engine would need
it. So jumping around in the file or using big memory caches will
be the result.
-The model might contain features that aren't supported by the
engine directly (even simple things like polygons vs. triangles
or double sided faces, UV coordinates attached with vertices or
faces). These features need to be converted into engine format
while loading which takes time.
-You can't control the format in which the things are saved (with
format I mean the problems like above), so some models might load
fast others slow.
So IMO we should focus on an exchange format, because that is what artists
need. The engines can provide converter apps for the exchange format then.
Greetings,
Matze
More information about the Protocols
mailing list