[WF-Protocols] Proposals on common format
Jorrit Tyberghein
Jorrit.Tyberghein at uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Tue Jul 1 16:30:19 PDT 2003
Alan Kemp wrote:
>>
>
>Forgive me if I have missed the point, but couldn't the factory definition
>just include a model filename instead of the raw data inline? With the
>current method if a model appears on two different levels, don't you end up
>duplicating data?
>
Yes but we shouldn't force people to define factories or object models in
seperate files. This should be a possibility but an optional one.
Greetings,
--
==============================================================================
Jorrit.Tyberghein at uz.kuleuven.ac.be, University Hospitals KU Leuven BELGIUM
"Emberella," thought Magrat. "I'm fairy godmothering a girl who sounds like
something you put up in the rain."
-- (Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad)
==============================================================================
More information about the Protocols
mailing list