[WF-Protocols] Proposals on common format

Jorrit Tyberghein Jorrit.Tyberghein at uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Tue Jul 1 16:30:19 PDT 2003


Alan Kemp wrote:

>>
>
>Forgive me if I have missed the point, but couldn't the factory definition
>just include a model filename instead of the raw data inline?  With the
>current method if a model appears on two different levels, don't you end up
>duplicating data?
>
Yes but we shouldn't force people to define factories or object models in
seperate files. This should be a possibility but an optional one.

Greetings,


-- 
==============================================================================
Jorrit.Tyberghein at uz.kuleuven.ac.be, University Hospitals KU Leuven BELGIUM

"Emberella," thought Magrat. "I'm fairy godmothering a girl who sounds like
something you put up in the rain."
        -- (Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad)
==============================================================================





More information about the Protocols mailing list